Official Luthiers Forum! http://www-.luthiersforum.com/forum/ |
|
Taylor Neck Video http://www-.luthiersforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10102&t=5055 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | crowduck [ Sun Feb 12, 2006 1:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I found this on the Taylor website, and thought it might be of interest here. Shows the Taylor neck joint system which is very similar to the double mortise/tenon joint that's been discussed here, and on John Mayes video. This link is for a high speed connection. https://www.taylorguitars.com/guitars/features/ntneck/Video. aspx?file=NT_Neck_High.wmx CrowDuck |
Author: | Andy Zimmerman [ Sun Feb 12, 2006 2:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
This link doesn't get you there... Tell us the path via the Taylor site Thanks Andy |
Author: | Don A [ Sun Feb 12, 2006 2:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Andy, try it here and select the video in the bottom right. Taylor actually sent out DVD's explaining their neck joint, and I believe the headstock scarf joint, when it was first introduced. |
Author: | vachterm [ Sun Feb 12, 2006 8:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
youd might also wanna try http://www.taylorguitars.com/see-hear/ its a section of the site with a whole lotta videos in it. some wood talk, all the factory fridays stuff, interviews and all... Udi |
Author: | Cocephus [ Mon Feb 13, 2006 1:27 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I did a repair on a Chris Adjustomatic last fall that had a neck adjustment scheme similar to Taylor`s. It relied on string tension and a setscrew in combination with a fulcrum. Very different! I have a couple of not so good pics of that if anyone`s interested. |
Author: | Michael Dale Payne [ Mon Feb 13, 2006 6:10 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Did eveyone notice? that the extension is never floating, it is always solid to the block. In a post a couple weeks ago we discussed this issue, and saw examples with floating extensions. Notice on a Taylor, if you change the set-back angle shim on the heal you also have to change the extenion shim as well to keep the extenion in full abd solid contact with the neck block. |
Author: | peterm [ Mon Feb 13, 2006 10:47 am ] |
Post subject: | |
looks like a good idea.....sure a lot easier to build in a factory with all those fancy machines! ![]() I think similar can be achieve without the shims but using the double mortise and tenon joint with an extension of the neck running under the FB extenstion! Just my thoughts! |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |